简体版 繁体版 第41章 《佃农理论》英语原著 (35)

第41章 《佃农理论》英语原著 (35)


我的冰山老板娘 契婚:腹黑老公要复婚 我家诊所通长安 极品丫鬟 极品宝宝辣皇后 八荒龙脉 净光欢喜佛 网游之修真法师 只做情人不做妻 绿水青山

第41章 《佃农理论》英语原著 (35)

Everytransactioninvolvesacontract.Thetransactionsconductedinthemarketplaceentailoutrightorpartialtransfersofpropertyrightsamongindividualcontractingparties.Thesetransfersmaybenegotiatedthroughmanydifferentcontractualarrangements.

Forgenerationseconomistsandlandtenurewritershavesoughttoranktherelativeefficiencyofresourceuseunderdifferentleasingarrangements.Buttheirinquirieswereundertakenwithoutexplicitreferencetothepropertyrightconstraintinvolved.Andinmanyinstances,thecharacteristicsofvariousleasecontractshadnotbeencarefullyexamined.Differentcontractualarrangementsdonotimplydifferentefficienciesofresourceallocationaslongaspropertyrightsareexclusiveandtransferable.Thecharacteristicsofleasecontractspresentedabovealsoconfirmthisstatement.

InthischapterIhaveasked:Whyaredifferentcontractualarrangementschosenunderthesamesystemofprivatepropertyrights?ToanswerthisquestionIhaveintroducedtransactioncostsandrisks.Theattempttoformulateachoice-theoreticapproachtoexplaintheobservedcontractualbehaviorinagri-culturehasperhapsraisedmorequestionsthanithasanswered.AndIhavebeenunabletopiecetogetherfragmentsofanalysisintoaformaltheory:theproblemsinthetheoryofchoiceinvolvingtransactioncostsandrisksarestillformidable.

Althoughthepresenceoftransactioncostsorrisksmayresultindifferentintensitiesofresourceuse,aswasnotedearlierinthischapter,availabledatadonotrevealnotabledifferencesinfarmingintensitiesforvariousleasingarrangementsunderprivatepropertyrights.[1]Thereasoningisasfollows.Themainformsoftenurearrangementsconsideredthusfarincludeownercultivation,wagecontracts,fixedrents,andsharecontracts.Forthesearrangements,economictheoryimpliesatendencytowardthesamesetofmarginalequalitiesofresourceuseeveniftransactioncostsexist.Toobtainanotabletendencytowardmarginalinequalities,transactioncostswouldhavetobesohighastoyield,forexample,thechoiceofacontractwithalump-sumchargeandwithoutquantifyingandpricingresourceunits.Lump-sumcontracts,however,havenotbeenimportantinAsianagricultureandcan,therefore,beignored.Instead,theeffectsoftransactioncostsandrisksarerevealedmainlyintheobservedchoiceofcontractualarrangementsand,lessnotably,theriskpremiumsdistributedamongthecontractingparties.

AmongsomerelatedproblemsthatIhaveexplicitlyavoided,thefollowingaresignificant.First,withrespecttoriskaversion,amoregeneralanalysiswouldincludeallriskychoices,notcontractualchoicealone.Theanalysiswouldbelessdifficultiftransactioncostswerenotinvolved.Second,withrespecttotransactioncosts,amoregeneralanalysiswouldderivesomespecificandwell-behavedcostfunctionoftransactions.Thisstepisessentialtothedevelopmentofamodelofgeneralequilibriumincludingtransactioncosts.

StillotherproblemsIhaveavoidedimplicitly.Inparticular,someleveloflawenforcementbylegalauthoritiesistakenforgranted.Onemaywellask:Whatwillhappentothechoiceofcontractsifthegovernmentchangesitsenforcementefforts?TowhatextentwilltheseeffortsbeconsistentwiththeParetocondition?Whatsetoflegalinstitutionsisconsistentwiththeoperationofthemarketplace?Withthesequestionsunanswered,theconditionsdefiningefficiencywithtransactioncostsarenotallclear.Letmeexplain.

Inproduction,costminimizationrequiresnotonlythefulfillmentofthefamiliarsetofmarginalequalities,butalsothechoiceofthelowest-costproductionmethodavailable.Intransactions,onerelevantconsiderationisthecostofalternativecontractualarrangements,whichIhavediscussedatsomelength.Onemightthinkthat,asacostconstraint,efficiencywillbeattainedwhen,otherthingsequal,thesetofarrangementswiththelowesttransactioncostischosen.Buttransactioncostsalsodependonalternativelegalarrangements.Forexample,thevaryingeffectivenessoflawenforcement,orthevaryingcorruptibilityofcourts,willaffectthecostsoftransactionsinthemarketplace.Giventheexistinglegalinstitutions,Ihaveattemptedtoexplaintheobservedcontractualarrangements.ButinsofarasIhaveignoredthechoiceanddevelopmentofthelegalinstitutions,theParetoconditionwithtransactioncostsisambiguous.

Ihavealsonotexploredthecontractualbehaviorassociatedwithdifferentpropertyrightconstraints.Variousrestrictionsonthetransferofpropertyrights,orvariousmethodsofattenuatingtherightofaresourceownertoobtaininefromhisresource,willaffecttheleasingarrangementsaswellasresourceallocation.IntheremainingchaptersIanalyzeoneimportantconstraint,namely,thelegallimitationonthelandowner'srentalinetoamaximumpercentageoftheannualyield.

[1].Oneexceptionisthatwefindthathousingassetsintenantfarmsweregenerallyoflowervaluethaninownerfarms(NationalGovernment,StatisticalAnalysis,pp.100-1).Itmaybebecausehousingisalsoaconsumptionitemandtenantsweretypicallypoorer.

5.TransferEffectsofRentalShareRestriction:HypothesisandEvidenceofOffsettingContractualRearrangements