第39章 《佃农理论》英语原著 (33)

---

匪警 总裁吃肉我喝汤 野心首席，太过份 陪嫁丫鬟——紫嫣 极品龙少爷 重生之魔教教主 独家公主限量爱 看错医 砂锅娘子 大神卖身不卖艺

---

第39章 《佃农理论》英语原著 (33)

Therighttoeachprivatelyownedresourceis,bydefinition,transferableandexclusivelydelineated.Rightstoresourcesinvestedinlandandotherassetsarenoexception.Intheforma-tionofaleasecontract,theparticipatingresourceownersarefreetoacceptorrejectthecontractualtermsbeingnegotiated.Again,thechoiceofthedurationofthecontractisnoexception.Thustherelevantquestionhereisnotwhethera"short-term"leaseisinefficient;therelevantquestioniswhydifferentleasedurationsarechosen.

Inaworldunplicatedbytransactioncostsandrisks,inwhichtherighttotheinegeneratedbyprivateinvestmentcouldbecostlesslysecuredandtransferred,andinwhichchangesincontractualstipulationscouldbecostlesslynegotiatedatanytime,thedurationoftheleasebeesirrelevantanditsex-plicitstipulationsuperfluous.Withtransactioncostsincluded,Iarguethattheleasedurationwillbechosentominimizethesecosts.Todoso,itisconvenienttoseparatethecostadvantagesof"long"and"short"leasedurations.

TheChoiceofRelativelyLongLeaseDuration

Arelativelylongleasedurationischosentoreducethecostoftransferring（transacting）tenantassetsattachedtoland.Thereexistdifferencesinphysicalattributesofcapitalassetswhichinvolvedifferentmovingcostsatleasedismissal.Forexample,awaterbuffaloownedbyatenantforgraingrindingiseasiertomoveatleasedismissalthananimprovementinwaterirrigationmadebyhim.Ofcourse,thelandownercouldhaveinvestedinthewaterirrigationhimself,orhecouldpurchasethetenant'smittedimprovementoutright.[5]Butwhenassetsattachedtolandareownedbythetenant,disputesmayariseintheeventoftenancydismissal.Aleasewithasufficientlylongdurationmaybeethepreferredoption.

However,thecostofmovingthephysicalassetisnotnecessarilytherelevantcosttoconsider.Thetenant'spropertyrighttohismittedinvestmentmaybetransferred,eithertoathirdpartyortothelandowner,atamarketprice.Theproblemisthatsuchapricemaynotexist,orcannotbeobtainedinashortperiodoftime,duetotransactioncosts.Oneneedonlypointoutthatthedepreciatedvalueofausedassetiscostlytoevaluate;thelandownermaychoosetoselecthisnewtenantinsteadofallowinganypartywhopurchasestheassettotakeoverthelease.Also,otherinformationproblemsexistinthemarketplace.Anappropriatelylongleasedurationwillthusreducedisputesandtheanticipatedcostoftransferringthetenant'spropertyright.Thischoice,however,canbemadeonlyattheexpenseofsomecostadvantagewhichashorterleasedurationprovides.

TheforegoingdiscussioncanbesupportedbyobservationsontheperpetualleaseinChina:

Underperpetualleasesthelandownerholdsownershiprighttothe[bottomof]land,andthetenantownstherighttothesoil……Thesetworightsareseparate.Theoccurrencesofperpetualleasesareconfinedtothefollowing:（1）thetenantexploited[privatelyowned]wastelandanddevelopeditintofarmland,thusgainingaperpetual[ownership]righttothesoilfromthelandowner.（2）Permanentimprovementsinlandmadebythetenant……suchasbuildingupwater-conservingdevicesinotherwisesandyfields……（3）……wherelaborisscarceandlandplentiful,thelandownersattractedtenantsfromafarbyofferingtheperpetualrighttotill[thesoil]……（4）Thetenanthadpaidalump-sumpaymenttoobtaintheperpetualrighttotill……And（5）thepeasant,wheninneedofmoney,soldtheownershiprighttothelandbottombutretainedtherighttotillthesoil.Sinceownershiprightstothebottomandsurfaceoflandareseparate,boththelandownerandthetenantcanselltheirrightsfreely,withouttheconsentfromeachother.[6]

Ineveryinstance,thetenant'sassetattachedtoland（forexample,therighttothesoil）isphysically"permanent."Withtheperpetualleaseandthecontractedtermsineffect,thelandownermaynotarbitrarilyraisethe"bottom"rent（oruseotherdevices）todrivethetenantaway.Yetsuchaleasedurationwouldnotbenecessaryiftransactioncostswerezero:Ifthe"bottom"and"surface"rightswereclearlydelineatedandcostlesslyenforcedasprivate,andiftheserightscouldbecostlesslytransferred,therewouldexistmarketpricesfortheserightsatwhichtransferscouldbeexecutedatanytime.[7]Thustherewouldbenoneedforlongleasedurationstoprotectthe"immobile"investmentsofthetenant.Thesamecanbesaidforotherassetsattachedtoland.

TheChoiceofRelativelyShortLeaseDuration

Theadoptionofarelativelylongleasedurationinvolvesforgoingsomecostadvantagewhichashorterdurationprovides.Whenassetsattachedtolandownedbythetenantaretobeexhaustedinashortperiodoftime,orwhenthelandownerprovidesallthe"permanent"assets,arelativelyshortleasedurationreducesthecostsofenforcingthecontractedtermsandofrenegotiatingtheseterms.

Whenacontractisformed,thecontractingpartiesmaylacksufficientinformationoneachother'sreliability.Withinaspecifiedleaseduration,theviolationofthecontractedtermsbyeitherpartymaycallforincreasingenforcementefforts,orforrevokingthecontractbeforeitsterminationdatethroughcourtactionorothermeans-alltobedoneatsomecost.Thechoiceofashorterleaseduration,whichfacilitatestenancydismissal,willreducethesecosts.Aswasnotedatthebeginningofthissection,however,thefrequencyoftenancydismissalswasfarlessthanthatofshort-termleases,suggestingthatmostterminatedleaseswererenewed.Availabledatashowthatthefrequencyofleasedismissalscausedbyrentaldisputeswaslow.[8]Iconjecture,therefore,thatshort-termleasesarechosenmoreasadevicetofacilitatecontractualrenegotiationthanasadevicetoreducethecostsofenforcingthecontractedterms.